agenttrading
How it works
Backtesting software AI stock analysis AI stock research Strategy tester Strategy builder Fundamental analysis Options backtesting Risk analysis Historical data Portfolio backtesting Stock analysis tools Best backtesting software Best AI trading software AI investing tools AI stock trading AI trading agent ETF backtesting Dividend backtesting Covered call backtest Momentum backtest Stock backtesting
Swing traders Day traders Long-term investors ETF investors Investment clubs Research teams Financial advisors
TrendSpider alternative Trade Ideas alternative Portfolio Visualizer alternative Tickeron alternative ChatGPT stock analysis Finviz alternative Seeking Alpha alternative Koyfin alternative TradingView alternative Danelfin alternative thinkorswim alternative Composer alternative E*TRADE alternative TradeStation alternative AmiBroker alternative Fidelity alternative Webull alternative Interactive Brokers alternative tastytrade alternative Stock Rover alternative QuantConnect alternative
Pricing Blog FAQ

FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORS - EVIDENCE FOR THE CLIENT CONVERSATION

Backtesting for financial advisors, evidence before the client call

Describe the allocation or tilt in plain English and Agenttrading backtests it on 20+ years of adjusted daily data, explains the drawdown and regime risk in words, and stamps an honest verdict you can defend in a review meeting.

See the time math

Independent advisors, RIAs, and planners who want to vet an allocation on real history before they put it in front of a client, and who need the test to be recorded and defensible.

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
01 THESIS · AS A TESTABLE RULE

02 EVIDENCE · FUNDAMENTALS

03 BACKTEST · GROWTH OF $10,000
Strategy Buy & hold

04 RISK · IN PLAIN ENGLISH

05 VERDICT · HISTORICAL, NOT PREDICTIVE

Past performance does not guarantee future results. Educational analysis only, not financial advice.

In short

Backtesting for financial advisors should turn a client question into evidence in minutes, and that is what Agenttrading is built to do: describe the allocation or tilt in plain English, such as "60 percent large-cap dividend payers, 40 percent aggregate bonds, rebalanced quarterly", and it restates the rule, backtests it on 20+ years of split- and dividend-adjusted daily data with a 0.1% cost per trade assumed by default, and reads the risk out in words, worst drawdown, how long recovery took, how concentrated the result is, and which market regimes produced the returns. The verdict is honest by design, including UNDERPERFORMED when a timing overlay loses to simply holding the blend, which is exactly the answer that protects a client relationship. It replaces the half-day loop of a spreadsheet, a data download, and a manual rebalance simulation with a single pass, and every assumption is printed on the result, so when a client or a compliance reviewer asks how a recommendation was tested, the answer is a link rather than a memory. Two honest boundaries: coverage is US-listed stocks and ETFs, and Agenttrading gives no personalized investment advice and makes no return promises, because past performance does not guarantee future results. It is educational analysis only, a research bench for you; the recommendation to the client, and the fiduciary judgment behind it, stay entirely yours.

Past performance does not guarantee future results. For educational and informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Consult a licensed advisor.

ON YOUR BENCH - FINANCIAL ADVISORS

What changes when the vetting is honest

Turn a client question into evidence in minutes

A client asks whether adding a dividend tilt would have helped. Describe it in plain English, run it on 20+ years of adjusted data, and walk into the next call with a drawdown chart and an honest verdict instead of an opinion.

Every recommendation carries an audit trail

Each run logs its date range, parameters, and cost assumptions. When a client or a compliance reviewer asks how an idea was tested, you send a link to the recorded run rather than reconstructing it from memory.

The risk conversation happens in plain English

Drawdown, concentration, regime dependence, and sample size are read out in words, so you can explain to a client what a 40 percent historical drawdown would have felt like before they ever have to live through one.

Honest verdicts protect the relationship

When a timing overlay UNDERPERFORMED simply holding the blend, the bench says so. Telling a client an idea did not work, with the evidence attached, is what keeps trust intact across a full market cycle.

THE MATH - TIME, NOT MAGIC

The manual loop is 4 to 6 hours per idea

A screener, ten filings, and a spreadsheet backtest, for every single idea. The bench runs the same loop in minutes and logs what it assumed. Count what that is worth in your week.

Your research hours, backTIME ONLY. NO RETURN MATH.

Manual vetting / month

h

Hours back with the bench

~h

On the same bench

Allocation-level tests run on the portfolio backtesting bench, and the plain-English risk read-out comes from investment risk analysis. The 20+ year record under every test is described on historical stock data, per-holding reads live on the fundamental analysis tool, and Enterprise terms with SSO and a shared audit trail are on pricing.

Who else runs the bench

Swing traders Day traders Long-term investors ETF investors Investment clubs

Your next idea deserves a verdict, not a hunch.

Bring a thesis or a ticker. Get the evidence, the backtest, the risks, and an honest stamp. Then decide for yourself.

Past performance does not guarantee future results. For educational and informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Consult a licensed advisor.